Comments on: 30 Horrific Commercial Photoshop Disasters

By: Creative Nerds Happy 1 Year Birthday | Creative Nerds

Creative Nerds Happy 1 Year Birthday | Creative Nerds — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:01:55 +0000

[...] The most popular article ever published on Creative Nerds is “30 Commercial Photoshop Disasters” [...]

By: Robert Bishop

Robert Bishop — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:19:24 +0000

“…who have made a poor job of not paying attention to detail when it comes to retouching photo’s.”

No apostrophe in “photos”, dear. Details, irony, etc.

Love the post, though!

The word Photo’s surely can be used. The apostrophe is to show omission, in this case graph…..what do you think people?

By: Tom

Tom — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:56:40 +0000

Agreed with the person who said “photo’s” is correct. Photo’s is a contraction of “photographs”, so the apostrophe signifies missing letters.

As you ought to say ‘phone instead of telephone.

By: Grubber

Grubber — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:39:47 +0000

I am not a designer and only found these because I am looking at getting a new logo done. Some of them I had to look at for a while (so I guess most non-skilled people like me would not have noticed), but once you see them they really stand out!

By: Joanne

Joanne — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:29:15 +0000

Great post I know the feeling when you just want to get the editing done and get a bit careless but have never airbrushed a belly button out! You’d think the clients would pick up on some of them.

By: Photodeus

Photodeus — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 02:22:07 +0000

Do a Google image search for the words “curves cereal” and you’ll see why the black girl isn’t photoshopped. She’s just wearing a t-shirt under.

By: Max

Max — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:42:10 +0000

Regarding the first comment about “photo’s” being wrong, and it should have been “photos”…

On first glance I’d agree, but if you think about it, photo is short for photograph, so that might be why the put an apostrophe in, to signify that some letters were missing, like you do with “can’t” for “can not”.

That said, I agree, it looks retarded!

By: Arla

Arla — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:43:38 +0000

Am I the only one who first thought the image in related articles, about “ABSTACT” brushes, was part of the set?

By: Paradise Planet

Paradise Planet — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:53:06 +0000

Lol… this is quite funny…

By: Stu | Self Conclusion

Stu | Self Conclusion — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:43:45 +0000

Haha some major brands doing some schoolboy errors right there!